This robot quarterback could be the future of football practice

The machine, called the Seeker, saw its NFL debut this week with a test run by the Green Bay Packers.


When the Green Bay Packers walked onto the practice field this week, they were greeted by an unusual new teammate: a robot.

In videos on Twitter, a 6-foot tall white robotic machine simulates a punter, kicking balls at a rapid pace to players downfield. The robot, which holds six balls in a revolving cartridge, could also imitate a quarterback’s style including the speed, arc and timing of a throw.

The Seeker is a robotic quarterback, kicker and punter rolled into one. It’s a modern day version of a piece of football equipment, called a JUGS machine, that’s been used to simulate throws and kicks to football players for decades. The Seeker, company officials say however, is a more accurate thrower and runs software to let players practice more advanced gameplay scenarios.

The robot, created by Dallas-based Monarc Sport, is starting to gain adoption. Top college football programs, such as Louisiana State University, the University of Oklahoma and the University of Iowa, all count the Seeker as part of their training strategy. The Green Bay Packers are the first team in the National Football League to try the technology.

The Seeker’s software allows players to customize how they practice with it. Athletes can catch balls from close to the machine to improve hand-eye coordination. They can also program the robot to throw a ball to a spot on the field, or simulate more-lifelike conditions by over or underthrowing a ball. Players wear a pager-like tag which allows the robot to track their location on the field, and throw a ball accurately within inches.

“It gives so much opportunity for our guys to get reps without the need of having a quarterback there,” said Ben Hansen, the director of football administration at Iowa, where the technology was first tested. “That’s a huge plus.”

Since the 1970s, football teams have relied on the JUGS machine to avoid wearing out quarterbacks and kickers. It fired off footballs through two high-speed rotating discs and allowed players to run routes or practice catching by themselves, operating with basic machinery and not utilizing software.

Over the decades, the machine — named after its creator, JUGS Sports — became commonplace on the football field. But it’s been criticized by football staff for poor performance.

Matt LaFleur, the head coach of the Green Bay Packers, spent a few minutes in early August criticizing the JUGS machine for not simulating punts well. “It was awful,” he said in a news conference. “You couldn’t get the ball to turn over. It was damn near impossible to catch.”

J.R. Reichenbach, a national account manager at JUGS Sports, said the company contacted the Packers after seeing the clip to ask if they could help alleviate the issue. “We were there for them,” he said. “They didn’t need anything, everything’s fine.”

Igor Karlicic and Bhargav Maganti, co-founders of Monarc Sport, started working on the Seeker in 2015 as engineering students at Northwestern University looking for a way that wide receivers could train on their own. They created a prototype and worked with Iowa to refine the concept.

The Seeker robot has two rotating discs, similar to a JUGS machine, that rotate quickly and help launch a ball. The robot can carry six balls at a time in cartridges, similar to a revolving gun chamber. Each robot costs roughly $40,000 to $50,000 per year for the hardware, software and servicing, Karlicic said.

“Small advantages matter a lot,” Karlicic said of the training options the robot offers. “All of this makes a huge impact on game day.”

Hansen, of Iowa, said in an interview that his team started using the Seeker in 2018. One of the most helpful parts of the technology, he said, is being able to program it to throw passes that simulate game day conditions. Unlike the JUGS machine, he said, which doesn’t have software to pass in random patterns, the Seeker can purposefully throw passes that aren’t perfect.

Previous
Previous

The emergence of the chief automation officer

Next
Next

Robots Are Key to Winning the Productivity War